Background of the Study
Electoral transparency is widely recognized as a cornerstone of democratic governance, as it fosters public trust and ensures the legitimacy of electoral outcomes. Transparency in electoral processes involves the availability of information, impartiality of electoral bodies, and accountability mechanisms that prevent malpractice (Ibrahim & Sule, 2024). Public trust in governance, on the other hand, reflects citizens’ confidence in political institutions and their belief in the system’s ability to deliver justice and equity (Usman & Ahmed, 2023). In Sokoto South Local Government, issues of electoral malpractice, including vote-buying, lack of transparency in vote tallying, and delays in election results, have raised questions about the credibility of governance structures (Olawale & Garba, 2025). Recent studies have emphasized that the erosion of trust in governance often stems from perceived irregularities in elections, which undermine democratic accountability and hinder socio-economic development (Yusuf & Adebayo, 2023). This study investigates the interplay between electoral transparency and public trust in governance within the context of Sokoto South, shedding light on how reforms can restore confidence in the electoral process and democratic institutions.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The persistent lack of transparency in electoral processes in Sokoto South Local Government has significantly eroded public trust in governance. Instances of electoral malpractice, ranging from manipulation of voter registers to delays in the announcement of results, have led to widespread disenchantment among the electorate (Abdullahi & Musa, 2023). This lack of trust not only undermines the legitimacy of elected officials but also poses a threat to democratic consolidation. While existing studies highlight the importance of electoral transparency, there is limited research on its direct impact on public trust at the local government level, particularly in Sokoto South. This gap in the literature necessitates an in-depth investigation to provide evidence-based recommendations for improving electoral processes and rebuilding public trust.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
To examine the level of electoral transparency in Sokoto South Local Government.
To assess the impact of electoral transparency on public trust in governance in Sokoto South.
To identify strategies for enhancing electoral transparency and public trust in governance.
1.4 Research Questions
What is the current level of electoral transparency in Sokoto South Local Government?
How does electoral transparency influence public trust in governance in Sokoto South?
What strategies can be adopted to enhance electoral transparency and rebuild public trust?
1.5 Research Hypotheses
Electoral transparency significantly influences public trust in governance in Sokoto South Local Government.
The lack of transparency in electoral processes contributes to diminished public trust in Sokoto South.
Effective reforms in electoral processes can improve public trust in governance in Sokoto South.
1.6 Significance of the Study
This study is important as it bridges the knowledge gap on the relationship between electoral transparency and public trust in governance, focusing on Sokoto South Local Government. By exploring this relationship, the research provides valuable insights for electoral bodies, policymakers, and civil society organizations seeking to strengthen democratic institutions. The findings will inform strategies for enhancing electoral transparency, thereby fostering greater public confidence in governance. Additionally, the study contributes to the academic discourse on electoral integrity, offering localized perspectives that complement broader national and international studies.
1.7 Scope and Limitations of the Study
The scope of this study is confined to Sokoto South Local Government in Sokoto State, examining the relationship between electoral transparency and public trust in governance. Data collection will focus exclusively on this locality and its electoral processes.
1.8 Operational Definition of Terms
Electoral Transparency: The degree to which electoral processes are open, accountable, and free from malpractice.
Public Trust in Governance: Citizens' confidence in political institutions and the perceived legitimacy of elected officials.
Electoral Integrity: The adherence to democratic principles and standards in the conduct of elections.
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out on fraud in financial institution and the auditors liability u...
Background of the Study
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional educational methods worldwide, leading to a rapid shift toward remote...
Background of the Study
The rapid evolution of digital technology has transformed the way banks combat financial crime. Fid...
Background of the Study
Online discussion forums have become a vital component of digital education, offering a platform f...
Background of the study
Social class is a critical factor influencing linguistic behavior, particularly in multilingual so...
ABSTRACT
Managers make decision in order to choose from alternative course of action at a dynamic rate. This is do...
Background of the Study
Chemotherapy is a cornerstone treatment for cancer, but it often comes with a v...
Abstract: This research analyzes regional disparities in access to technical education in N...
ABSTRACT
This study examines the perception of northern women on the use of sex appeal advertisements in Yola, the basis that underlined...
Background of the Study
Malnutrition is a significant concern for elderly patients, of...